<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SearchMe.com is Useful</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lingpipe-blog.com/2008/08/05/searchmecom-is-useful/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lingpipe-blog.com/2008/08/05/searchmecom-is-useful/</link>
	<description>Natural Language Processing and Text Analytics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 22:30:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lingpipe</title>
		<link>http://lingpipe-blog.com/2008/08/05/searchmecom-is-useful/#comment-2692</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lingpipe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lingpipe.wordpress.com/?p=123#comment-2692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yikes -- there&#039;s not even titles on those back pages.  

They&#039;re also not doing spell checking (or at least doing it with such low recall I haven&#039;t seen it), and they have lots of non-existent pages referenced (as does Google these days).

After two days, I conclude that I can&#039;t use Searchme as a general Google replacement, but it&#039;s still very useful for searching for things like recipes where visual inspection is so much better than snippets.  So it&#039;s at least staying on my Firefox pulldown.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yikes &#8212; there&#8217;s not even titles on those back pages.  </p>
<p>They&#8217;re also not doing spell checking (or at least doing it with such low recall I haven&#8217;t seen it), and they have lots of non-existent pages referenced (as does Google these days).</p>
<p>After two days, I conclude that I can&#8217;t use Searchme as a general Google replacement, but it&#8217;s still very useful for searching for things like recipes where visual inspection is so much better than snippets.  So it&#8217;s at least staying on my Firefox pulldown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Otis Gospodnetic</title>
		<link>http://lingpipe-blog.com/2008/08/05/searchmecom-is-useful/#comment-2691</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Otis Gospodnetic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lingpipe.wordpress.com/?p=123#comment-2691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just tried them again and liked what I saw.  But look at your browser&#039;s history (back button) after you flip through 10-20+ pages.  That sucks for those of us who use that back button all the time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just tried them again and liked what I saw.  But look at your browser&#8217;s history (back button) after you flip through 10-20+ pages.  That sucks for those of us who use that back button all the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
