<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Artists Ship, or the Best is the Enemy of the Good</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lingpipe-blog.com/2008/12/02/artists-ship-or-the-best-is-the-enemy-of-the-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lingpipe-blog.com/2008/12/02/artists-ship-or-the-best-is-the-enemy-of-the-good/</link>
	<description>Natural Language Processing and Text Analytics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:47:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lingpipe</title>
		<link>http://lingpipe-blog.com/2008/12/02/artists-ship-or-the-best-is-the-enemy-of-the-good/#comment-3154</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lingpipe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 22:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lingpipe.wordpress.com/?p=301#comment-3154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter&#039;s parsing of the first three analogies is how I read Steve Jobs&#039;s use of &quot;ship&quot;:  &quot;artist/industrialist, ademic/commercial, publish/ship.&quot;  I took his point to be that you&#039;re not an artist (industrialist) until you publish (ship).   And that requires one to satisfice rather than optimize (assuming we can never reach perfection).

Re-reading the industrialist or auteur post, I&#039;m wondering if I misquoted.  My takeaway from the &lt;i&gt;New Yorker&lt;/i&gt; article was that Disney thought of himself as a perfectionist, and that made him an &quot;artist&quot;, to be contrasted with the &quot;industrialist&quot;, who released any old thing.  Of course, Disney shipped a lot of product, so I don&#039;t know where that leaves him.

I should&#039;ve looked before quoting.  I didn&#039;t know who Douglas Engelbart is, but now I see he&#039;s the inventor of the (computer) mouse, so I see where the confusion arises.  As an academic,  your product is your papers, so he shipped as an academic.  SRI simply failed to build a mouse into computers.  I spent four years at Bell Labs and know the scientists don&#039;t control the releases! Not that I ever built anything as cool as the mouse, the photo of 1967 version of which on &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_Engelbart&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Englebart&#039;s Wikipedia page&lt;/a&gt; is like something out of &lt;a href=&quot;http://makezine.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Make magazine&lt;/a&gt;.   So shame on the author for taking him to task (and on me for quoting blindly).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter&#8217;s parsing of the first three analogies is how I read Steve Jobs&#8217;s use of &#8220;ship&#8221;:  &#8220;artist/industrialist, ademic/commercial, publish/ship.&#8221;  I took his point to be that you&#8217;re not an artist (industrialist) until you publish (ship).   And that requires one to satisfice rather than optimize (assuming we can never reach perfection).</p>
<p>Re-reading the industrialist or auteur post, I&#8217;m wondering if I misquoted.  My takeaway from the <i>New Yorker</i> article was that Disney thought of himself as a perfectionist, and that made him an &#8220;artist&#8221;, to be contrasted with the &#8220;industrialist&#8221;, who released any old thing.  Of course, Disney shipped a lot of product, so I don&#8217;t know where that leaves him.</p>
<p>I should&#8217;ve looked before quoting.  I didn&#8217;t know who Douglas Engelbart is, but now I see he&#8217;s the inventor of the (computer) mouse, so I see where the confusion arises.  As an academic,  your product is your papers, so he shipped as an academic.  SRI simply failed to build a mouse into computers.  I spent four years at Bell Labs and know the scientists don&#8217;t control the releases! Not that I ever built anything as cool as the mouse, the photo of 1967 version of which on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_Engelbart" rel="nofollow">Englebart&#8217;s Wikipedia page</a> is like something out of <a href="http://makezine.com/" rel="nofollow">Make magazine</a>.   So shame on the author for taking him to task (and on me for quoting blindly).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Turney</title>
		<link>http://lingpipe-blog.com/2008/12/02/artists-ship-or-the-best-is-the-enemy-of-the-good/#comment-3153</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Turney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 21:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lingpipe.wordpress.com/?p=301#comment-3153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is some ambiguity in your use of the word &quot;ship&quot;. In the first paragraph, it seems to mean &quot;shipping a product to a client&quot;, but in the second paragraph, it seems to include publishing a book. A quick search on Google Scholar shows that Douglas Engelbart did indeed publish a respectable amount. I followed the link to Industrialist or Auteur? and I&#039;m still not sure what the message is. I think there is a latent message that the artist/industrialist, academic/commercial, publish/ship, and optimizing/satisficing dimensions are parallel, but I don&#039;t agree. 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satisficing]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is some ambiguity in your use of the word &#8220;ship&#8221;. In the first paragraph, it seems to mean &#8220;shipping a product to a client&#8221;, but in the second paragraph, it seems to include publishing a book. A quick search on Google Scholar shows that Douglas Engelbart did indeed publish a respectable amount. I followed the link to Industrialist or Auteur? and I&#8217;m still not sure what the message is. I think there is a latent message that the artist/industrialist, academic/commercial, publish/ship, and optimizing/satisficing dimensions are parallel, but I don&#8217;t agree. </p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satisficing" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satisficing</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

