<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lucida Console is My Font</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lingpipe-blog.com/2009/05/19/lucida-console-is-my-font/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lingpipe-blog.com/2009/05/19/lucida-console-is-my-font/</link>
	<description>Natural Language Processing and Text Analytics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 20:56:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nic</title>
		<link>http://lingpipe-blog.com/2009/05/19/lucida-console-is-my-font/#comment-5523</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lingpipe-blog.com/?p=1454#comment-5523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I use Lucida Typeweriter in emacs. Can&#039;t stand large anti-aliased fonts, and I&#039;m not much a fan of sans serif either.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Lucida Typeweriter in emacs. Can&#8217;t stand large anti-aliased fonts, and I&#8217;m not much a fan of sans serif either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lingpipe</title>
		<link>http://lingpipe-blog.com/2009/05/19/lucida-console-is-my-font/#comment-5270</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lingpipe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lingpipe-blog.com/?p=1454#comment-5270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the clarification -- I thought Lucida Console and Typewriter Sans were the same font.  I&#039;m using Lucida Sans Typewriter in LaTeX and Lucida Console in emacs and shell (on Windows).

According to &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucida#Lucida_Console&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wikipedia: Lucida&lt;/a&gt;, Lucida Console is &quot;a variant of Lucida Sans Typewriter with smaller line spacing, added WGL4 character set.&quot;  

It didn&#039;t say the text itself was shorter, just the line spacing.  Here&#039;s a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.papress.com/thinkingwithtype/text/line_spacing.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;nice page on line spacing&lt;/a&gt; from &lt;i&gt;Thinking with Type&lt;/i&gt;, a book I really liked.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the clarification &#8212; I thought Lucida Console and Typewriter Sans were the same font.  I&#8217;m using Lucida Sans Typewriter in LaTeX and Lucida Console in emacs and shell (on Windows).</p>
<p>According to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucida#Lucida_Console" rel="nofollow">Wikipedia: Lucida</a>, Lucida Console is &#8220;a variant of Lucida Sans Typewriter with smaller line spacing, added WGL4 character set.&#8221;  </p>
<p>It didn&#8217;t say the text itself was shorter, just the line spacing.  Here&#8217;s a <a href="http://www.papress.com/thinkingwithtype/text/line_spacing.htm" rel="nofollow">nice page on line spacing</a> from <i>Thinking with Type</i>, a book I really liked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MSW</title>
		<link>http://lingpipe-blog.com/2009/05/19/lucida-console-is-my-font/#comment-5261</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MSW]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 19:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lingpipe-blog.com/?p=1454#comment-5261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes Lucida Console is easier on the eyes than Inconsolata or Envy Code.

But there is a difference between Lucida Console and Lucida Sans Typewriter -- Lucida Console is a bit shorter, giving more text in the same vertical area (horizontal sizing is the same).  That&#039;s worth something to me.

I don&#039;t know where to find Lucida Console free, but it comes with Windows.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Lucida Console is easier on the eyes than Inconsolata or Envy Code.</p>
<p>But there is a difference between Lucida Console and Lucida Sans Typewriter &#8212; Lucida Console is a bit shorter, giving more text in the same vertical area (horizontal sizing is the same).  That&#8217;s worth something to me.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know where to find Lucida Console free, but it comes with Windows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan O&#039;Connor</title>
		<link>http://lingpipe-blog.com/2009/05/19/lucida-console-is-my-font/#comment-4731</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brendan O&#039;Connor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 18:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lingpipe-blog.com/?p=1454#comment-4731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree, no antialiasing for &lt;= 9 or 10pt.  Monaco, the mac default, works well enough for me there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, no antialiasing for &lt;= 9 or 10pt.  Monaco, the mac default, works well enough for me there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lingpipe</title>
		<link>http://lingpipe-blog.com/2009/05/19/lucida-console-is-my-font/#comment-4713</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lingpipe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 16:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lingpipe-blog.com/?p=1454#comment-4713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@John  Interesting comment about refactoring.  I&#039;m wondering if that explains why I&#039;ve been using the bigger font more for the recent round of refactoring I&#039;ve done.  I figured it was just because it gets set as the default after lots of pair programming.  

I still prefer the smaller font for creating new classes and especially for browsing big classes of mine or in other packages.   

I also prefer the small font for shells, because it&#039;s easier to see the output.

With the small font, I can get a good emacs and shell buffer side by side.  I try to keep LingPipe code to 80 characters wide, but with generics, that&#039;s getting harder and harder.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@John  Interesting comment about refactoring.  I&#8217;m wondering if that explains why I&#8217;ve been using the bigger font more for the recent round of refactoring I&#8217;ve done.  I figured it was just because it gets set as the default after lots of pair programming.  </p>
<p>I still prefer the smaller font for creating new classes and especially for browsing big classes of mine or in other packages.   </p>
<p>I also prefer the small font for shells, because it&#8217;s easier to see the output.</p>
<p>With the small font, I can get a good emacs and shell buffer side by side.  I try to keep LingPipe code to 80 characters wide, but with generics, that&#8217;s getting harder and harder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://lingpipe-blog.com/2009/05/19/lucida-console-is-my-font/#comment-4712</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 14:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lingpipe-blog.com/?p=1454#comment-4712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anti-aliasing is best for large fonts anyway. Once you get below 10px, things start looking fuzzy and some letter details are anti-aliased away. 

I just started using Inconsolata, and you&#039;re right -- at 9px it&#039;s terrible. At 18px though, it&#039;s great. And so far I&#039;m really liking the larger typeface for coding; I&#039;m finding I don&#039;t really need to see all that information at once. What I really need to do is concentrate on the code I am writing or refactoring at the moment, and the rest of it is a disorienting distraction.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anti-aliasing is best for large fonts anyway. Once you get below 10px, things start looking fuzzy and some letter details are anti-aliased away. </p>
<p>I just started using Inconsolata, and you&#8217;re right &#8212; at 9px it&#8217;s terrible. At 18px though, it&#8217;s great. And so far I&#8217;m really liking the larger typeface for coding; I&#8217;m finding I don&#8217;t really need to see all that information at once. What I really need to do is concentrate on the code I am writing or refactoring at the moment, and the rest of it is a disorienting distraction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

