<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Probability Measures and Random Variables</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lingpipe-blog.com/2009/12/11/probability-measures-and-random-variables/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lingpipe-blog.com/2009/12/11/probability-measures-and-random-variables/</link>
	<description>Natural Language Processing and Text Analytics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 20:56:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Online Statistics Course - Introduction to Random Variables</title>
		<link>http://lingpipe-blog.com/2009/12/11/probability-measures-and-random-variables/#comment-17858</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Online Statistics Course - Introduction to Random Variables]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lingpipe-blog.com/?p=3164#comment-17858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] #3D3D3D; } ul.dates .date{ color:#858585; padding:0 1.5em 0 0; }  //  Networking CommunicationsProbability Measures and Random Variables   [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] #3D3D3D; } ul.dates .date{ color:#858585; padding:0 1.5em 0 0; }  //  Networking CommunicationsProbability Measures and Random Variables   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lingpipe</title>
		<link>http://lingpipe-blog.com/2009/12/11/probability-measures-and-random-variables/#comment-5990</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lingpipe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 05:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lingpipe-blog.com/?p=3164#comment-5990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the clarification about directionality of limits.  This is like an analysis flashback.  In all the continuous cases I ever deal with, everything&#039;s the same either way.  But when you get into step functions, the limits are different depending on which way you approach.  I&#039;ll have to be more careful about the definitions, which will take a while, because I&#039;ll have to understand them better.

Good point about different measures on the same algebra.  It&#039;d make sense that you&#039;d think about the conditionals as another measure, because they&#039;ll satisfy all the properties.  

Again, I&#039;m really just used to thinking about everything in terms of joint densities of fairly simple functional forms.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the clarification about directionality of limits.  This is like an analysis flashback.  In all the continuous cases I ever deal with, everything&#8217;s the same either way.  But when you get into step functions, the limits are different depending on which way you approach.  I&#8217;ll have to be more careful about the definitions, which will take a while, because I&#8217;ll have to understand them better.</p>
<p>Good point about different measures on the same algebra.  It&#8217;d make sense that you&#8217;d think about the conditionals as another measure, because they&#8217;ll satisfy all the properties.  </p>
<p>Again, I&#8217;m really just used to thinking about everything in terms of joint densities of fairly simple functional forms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doug</title>
		<link>http://lingpipe-blog.com/2009/12/11/probability-measures-and-random-variables/#comment-5984</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[doug]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lingpipe-blog.com/?p=3164#comment-5984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few little typos... your convention of defining the cdf to be left continuous is a little unusual, but with it F(b) - F(a) = P{ X in [a,b) }.

Also, measurability depends only on the sigma-algebra, not the measure (which turns out to be important in probability theory, where, with conditional probabilities, you have many different measures on the same sigma-algebra).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few little typos&#8230; your convention of defining the cdf to be left continuous is a little unusual, but with it F(b) &#8211; F(a) = P{ X in [a,b) }.</p>
<p>Also, measurability depends only on the sigma-algebra, not the measure (which turns out to be important in probability theory, where, with conditional probabilities, you have many different measures on the same sigma-algebra).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

