<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Building High Precision Classifiers, Taggers, Chunkers, Spelling Correctors, &#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lingpipe-blog.com/2010/04/22/high-precision-classifiers-taggers-chunkers-spelling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lingpipe-blog.com/2010/04/22/high-precision-classifiers-taggers-chunkers-spelling/</link>
	<description>Natural Language Processing and Text Analytics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:47:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Text Classification for Sentiment Analysis &#8211; Precision and Recall &#171;streamhacker.com</title>
		<link>http://lingpipe-blog.com/2010/04/22/high-precision-classifiers-taggers-chunkers-spelling/#comment-6888</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Text Classification for Sentiment Analysis &#8211; Precision and Recall &#171;streamhacker.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 14:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lingpipe-blog.com/?p=3882#comment-6888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] F-measure to be about as useful as accuracy. Or in other words, compared to precision &amp; recall, F-measure is mostly useless, as you&#039;ll see below.Measuring Precision and Recall of a Naive Bayes ClassifierThe NLTK metrics [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] F-measure to be about as useful as accuracy. Or in other words, compared to precision &amp; recall, F-measure is mostly useless, as you&#039;ll see below.Measuring Precision and Recall of a Naive Bayes ClassifierThe NLTK metrics [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob</title>
		<link>http://lingpipe-blog.com/2010/04/22/high-precision-classifiers-taggers-chunkers-spelling/#comment-6773</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lingpipe-blog.com/?p=3882#comment-6773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s a suggestion for naming that non Active Learning process: Manualated Learning. I&#039;m doing something like that right now:
1) Identify uniquely specific keywords for classification
2) Classify documents based on the frequency of those keywords
3) Use those classified documents as training data for supervised classification

We&#039;re currently in the &quot;manualation loop&quot; of 1 &amp; 2, but we&#039;ll soon be feeding 2 into 3 to see how the results are.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a suggestion for naming that non Active Learning process: Manualated Learning. I&#8217;m doing something like that right now:<br />
1) Identify uniquely specific keywords for classification<br />
2) Classify documents based on the frequency of those keywords<br />
3) Use those classified documents as training data for supervised classification</p>
<p>We&#8217;re currently in the &#8220;manualation loop&#8221; of 1 &amp; 2, but we&#8217;ll soon be feeding 2 into 3 to see how the results are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Breck Baldwin</title>
		<link>http://lingpipe-blog.com/2010/04/22/high-precision-classifiers-taggers-chunkers-spelling/#comment-6757</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Breck Baldwin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lingpipe-blog.com/?p=3882#comment-6757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Customers will almost always ask for 90% or more for whatever metric we hand them, I think it is because in the American school system 90% or above is an A. When they actually see data they tend to be happy with lower performance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Customers will almost always ask for 90% or more for whatever metric we hand them, I think it is because in the American school system 90% or above is an A. When they actually see data they tend to be happy with lower performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

